This video has just been released by NHS Education for Scotland about life as a surgeon in the Shetland Isles….
Aberdeen University Medical School have just released this video to report on a project which enabled first year medical students to experience rural general practice. A new initiative by the University, made possible by a donation from Mr Joe Officer, saw 14 first year medical students taken on a two day adventure to Cairngorm national park and the surrounding area, to speak to those working in rural practices and to see first-hand the benefits of living and working in the countryside.
It’s increasingly recognised that career advice is essential for the earlier stages of medical school. Role modelling and creating career aspirations early on can be hugely helpful to students who are thinking about their future career options. As exposure to rural general practice tends only to be available in the later stages of medical school, this project highlights some of the reactions of students who were given the opportunity to learn more about Rural GP earlier on in their careers.
It’s pretty eye opening just how much can be done in a rural setting when you have a purpose built GP hospital
Kudos to Aberdeen University for recording the experience in such a vibrant and professional manner, and to the students for giving such articulated reflections and comments through the video too. Maybe this is something that could be rolled out on a wider level?
Clinical considerations and ethical deliberations from a rural Caribbean clinic
Dr Josie Reynolds recently contacted RuralGP.com to offer to write about her experiences and observations from rural Jamaica. We’re delighted to feature the first of these articles here…
As doctors, we are most comfortable with our diagnoses when we have investigative results to confirm them. This is especially true for those trained in high-income countries, as more and more sophisticated laboratory tests and imaging have become part of everyday practice.
But in rural, remote settings, particularly those of low and middle income countries, the practicality and cost of diagnostic testing can become a barrier to treatment. This barrier is intensified in the management of sexually transmitted infections by the taboo and stigma that surround these conditions.
Because of this it has been argued that a syndromic approach to STI management can be more appropriate to tackle the burden of disease. Syndromic management of STIs works by grouping symptoms and signs of disease into syndromes and treating based on the most common causative pathogen(s), e.g. vaginal discharge syndrome, lower abdominal pain and male urethritis syndrome.
This practical approach in the most resource poor environments can help to tackle high burden of disease, therefore reducing significant morbidity, infertility and increasing spread of infection. In these settings there is a strong argument for forgoing the lab tests and treating empirically.
But what about those settings that fall somewhere in the middle?
At what point is it more appropriate to treat following laboratory testing?
Are there any markers that indicate the tip of balance in favour of a laboratory-based approach?
Picture a rural Caribbean health clinic. The mountainous community can seem remote based on the terrible conditions of the roads, but in fact as the crow flies there is only 10 miles to the capital city. There is also fairly regular transport by bus to the city Mon – Sat, and a public run clinic in town which provides free STI testing and treatment (all be it slow).
Community members, however, have very little disposable income and primarily lead subsistence lifestyles. With this in mind, working as a primary care physician at the clinic, I was not keen to send people away without treatment in case they did not go to get testing & treatment and the infection continued to spread. Syndromic management, therefore, seemed the way to go…
But the more I thought about syndromic management – STI management without any laboratory testing – the more negative implications I could think of:
- Contact tracing – this is still possible, but do you treat all sexual contacts even if symptom free? This could expose numerous people to the risk of unnecessary medications when there is no guarantee that they have the disease.
- Missing concomitant STIs e.g. HIV – it’s not uncommon for STIs to come in pairs and symptoms are frequently vague or non-existent. Treating syndromically without testing misses the opportunity to pick up some of the more serious infections that may be present simultaneously.
- Contributing to antibiotic resistance – as one of the biggest threats to modern medicine, antibiotic resistance cannot be ignored. Whilst syndromic management may be the pragmatic approach, the greater picture needs to be considered.
- Relaxed approach – could syndromic management give patients the impression that STIs are not very serious as no testing is required? Could this apparently relaxed approach translate into less incentive to prevent reinfection?
- The subtle symptoms – for the barn-door cases, where signs & symptoms are clear and fit neatly into the box, this approach is straight-forward. But what about the grey areas? Or the patients which don’t follow the usual pattern?
- Impact on doctor-patient relationship – with a less evidence-based approach and therefore greater risk of treatment failure, is there a danger of loss of trust or breakdown of relationship between the healthcare provider and patient?
- Reliable statistics – guidelines for syndromic management often mention adding in treatment for certain infections, e.g. gonorrhoea, if there are high levels in the region. However, in low-middle income settings, the epidemiological data is less likely to be complete and therefore recorded levels may be misleading.
I found myself in a struggling health system, but provisions were not non-existent – should I accept the flaws of the approach and treat syndromically or encourage patients to overcome the barriers and receive a better standard of care overall?
I realised too that part of my reserve for syndromic management linked into a deeper notion: by accepting syndromic management as routine are we reinforcing the idea that disadvantaged people deserve second rate healthcare?
Or perhaps my scientific-based training was blinding me to the benefits of syndromic management? Was my personal desire to get to the bottom of the cause preventing me from putting the important things first?
Either way, it appears to me that a more sophisticated set of guidelines is required from the Global Health Sector to reflect the variations in development of health systems worldwide, rather than a binary choice which may work for some, but not for all.
What do you think? What would you do in a similar situation? Which factors would tip the balance in your decision?
RuralGP.com has just received this request from Elizabeth, who is seeking contributions to research that she is carrying out into the needs of remote & rural practice in Scotland. If you are able to assist, please contact Elizabeth directly…
My name is Elizabeth Lemmon, I am a PhD student based at the University of Stirling and currently undertaking an internship at the Scottish Government within the Health and Social Care Analysis Team. The aim of the internship is to carry out some research into remote and rural general practice in Scotland in an attempt to better characterise them in terms of their activities and the challenges they face. I’m currently pulling together data which are publicly available on general practices to improve the evidence base and identify where further data analysis are needed.
I am contacting you to ask if anyone would be interested in sharing their experiences within remote and rural general practice and highlight any areas which you feel are priorities or which need further research?
I understand that there is currently work taking place within the Scottish Government on the Primary Care Evidence Collaborative which is developing a 10-year evaluation framework for primary care transformation. The work I will be doing during my internship on remote and rural practices will help to identify priorities for data, research and analysis and ensure that rural issues are included.
Any feedback is much appreciated!
Scottish Graduate School of Social Science Intern
Health and Social Care Analysis
T: 0131 244 3469
Back in March, the Rural GP Association of Scotland (RGPAS) launched a range of guidance designed to make rural practice in Scotland more accessible to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBTQ+) patients.
At the annual RGPAS Conference last year, held in Inverness, we were delighted to welcome Dr Thom O’Neill to talk about LGBTQ+ inequalities in rural areas, and some of the practical ways that as GPs we can reduce barriers to healthcare.
Thom’s presentation stimulated a lot of discussion, and led to a project whereby he worked with RGPAS to develop factsheets, posters and other materials to help rural GP practices ensure that their services are welcoming to LGBTQ+ patients – especially younger patients.
We are aware that since then a number of GP practices have had discussions in their teams about how to make their health services more LGBTQ+ accessible. We’ve also had a number of international enquiries about this work – including from Canada, New Zealand and Australia – who have been keen to use this work to increase awareness.
Thom has also been asked to adapt the factsheets for secondary care use in some parts of Scotland too. So, as expected, the theme seems to have resonated with a wide number of clinicians and service managers.
Thom and David recently caught up to discuss how these guidelines came about, and to explore some of the themes of why LGBTQ+ patients seem to face specific inequalities of access to health care – and how rural practice has some unique opportunities to improve this. We hope to have Thom back to this year’s RGPAS Conference (2-4 November, once again in Inverness – details soon) for an update on what how this work has been developing.
You can listen to the podcast here:
In the podcast above, we make reference to the work of Alex Bertie about recording his experience of seeking help and assistance with gender dysphoria. Alex’s videos make for some insightful and compelling viewing, but this one is specifically about his thoughts about the GP consultation – and the difference that a more supportive and informed consultation can make particularly at a challenging and difficult time.
Thanks to RGPAS member Dr Richard Weekes for highlighting some fantastic work going on in NHS Highland to innovate eHealth applications aimed at improving access to healthcare in rural settings.
Here’s an introductory video showcasing some of the projects…
…an STV news item about the PILLCAM project in Ullapool to provide easy access to endoscopy facilities – using some very novel technology…
… and more about bringing endoscopy to rural communities…
… and the RAPID project to overcome connectivity challenges in rural Scotland…
The next EMRS ScotSTAR Clinical Governance meeting is due to take place on Friday 12th May, at 1.30pm.
These meetings take place at the EMRS base next to Glasgow Aiport, and VC links are invited (via the NHS Scotland VC Network) from rural practitioners (GPs, nurses, paramedics) across Scotland.
The team values input and opinion at these meetings from rural practitioners. Combining the insight of both referring site clinicians and retrieval teams into the intricacies of missions audited creates a fantastic learning environment. Attendees come away from these meetings enthused and encouraged to provide the highest possible levels of care for our patients.
The meeting on Friday brings a few cases under the longitudinal audit microscope. The EMRS team have chosen two of the most challenging cases, one primary and one secondary retrieval and opinion will be welcomed in dissecting out the details so that we can learn from combined experience.
To join the meeting, contact Anne Cadman (details in agenda below) with your VC details.Download the agenda for this meeting
The above text was modified from an email sent out recently by Dr Randal McRoberts, Consultant at EMRS and lead for the Clinical Governance meetings.
The Scottish Rural Medicine Collaborative (SRMC) is a programme funded by the Scottish Government’s GP Recruitment and Retention Fund. The programme – chaired by Ralph Roberts (Chief Executive of NHS Shetland) – is about developing ways to improve the recruitment and retention of GPs working in a rural setting across ten Health Board areas in Scotland – Grampian, Highland, Orkney, Shetland, Western Isles, Dumfries & Galloway, Ayrshire & Arran, Fife, Tayside and Borders. Also involved are NES, NHS HR Directors, RCGP Scotland and Rural GP Association. They are now looking for assistance from the rural health community in Scotland……
The SRMC Programme Board have agreed that the programme will work in the six project areas outlined above and are looking for the following people to support this work:
- A Programme Clinical Lead which will be funded 2 PAs (0.2 WTE) per week towards backfill for the post holder and will work across the whole Programme.
- Project Leads for Project 2* (Rural GP Recruitment Yearly Wheel), Project 3* (Rural GP Marketing Resources) and Project 6* (Rural GP Recruitment Support). More details about these individual projects are available in Appendix 1 in the linked document below. They would be particularly interested to hear from HR Managers or Practice Managers.
- Project Team Members for all projects. They would be particularly interested to hear from HR Managers or Practice Managers.
Please note your interest by Monday 22nd May 2017.
One of the sessions at #ruralwonca was delivered by some of the team at the Journal for Remote & Rural Health. I was really sorry to miss it, due to presenting in another session, but my tweeted request to make the advice available online was answered quickly and the presentation is now available – see below.
The journal team are keen to encourage and motivate rural healthcare professionals to share their research, and seem genuinely interested in helping budding writers to put pen-to-paper or finger-to-keyboard.
There is a lot of great innovation and problem-solving going on in rural practice. Rural healthcare professionals tend to know their communities well, are used to dealing with limited resources, and some of the best examples of teamwork are to be found in rural settings. However ‘being academic‘ does not come easy to everyone, and the process of writing up evaluation and research can sometimes feel tedious and time-consuming.
However, it is now easier than ever to find interested journals, and there seems to be a drive to make the steps to getting work published more accessible.
Watch the presentation below for the RRH team’s top tips on getting your research out to a wider audience. You can find the guidelines for authors available here.
Also, on the theme of research, here’s a great project that aims to enable rural doctors to develop their research activity through pragmatic and direct support. Delivered by the Faculty of Medicine at Memorial University in Newfoundland, it’s called the ‘6 for 6’ programme. Click here for more details or watch the video below.
Today marks the start of the 14th WONCA World Rural Health Conference, being held in Cairns, Australia.
The programme is set to contain a fantastically diverse range of research and workshops covering everything from improvements in patient care, to developing new and effective ways to collaborate across boundaries in rural health. You can follow the events on twitter using the #RuralWonca hashtag, and already there has been a huge number of comment and links
So far, the vibe at #RuralWonca has been great… benefitting from Cairns hospitality (boosted by a dynamic and helpful team from ACRRM) and a stimulating range of input from stalwart experts in rural medicine, to young, enthusiastic students and young doctors.
Thursday saw a full day of proceedings for the WONCA World Working Party for Rural Health – with the annual Council meeting held in spectacular surroundings of a seminar room looking directly onto rainforest. As well as hearing about events from the last year, and sorting out logistics for yet another busy year ahead, there was debate about how best to support member organisations and do everything possible to support the growing number of student and young doctor organisations. The highlight of 2018 is set to be the 15th World Rural Health Conference. Crumbs, we haven’t even started the 14th conference yet, but for a taster of what’s in store – in New Delhi – see the video below!
Friday brought the World Summit on Rural Generalist Medicine. The concept and importance of rural generalism in health ecosystems is reaching high levels of resonance now within Australia (where political support for recognising this is higher than ever), and much further afield in both ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ nations. It is clear that empowering rural generalism within healthcare systems has never been more important, with absolute needs to train future doctors in medical complexity, meet the demands of an ageing population and achieve the levels of health service efficiency that are often more easy to find in the generalist setting.
The Summit also saw the launch of the Japanese Rural Generalist Programme: a major achievement and indicative of the direction that other countries are likely to go too, not least through the inspiration that these developments bring.
You can follow tweets from the Summit meeting using the hashtag #RuralGeneralist
And now for the main event. This looks set to be a stimulating and busy few days ahead, bringing together an enthusiastic and dedicated group of international confreres giving the opportunity to recognise and drive forward international innovation and collaboration in rural health. We hope to feature a number of interviews and reports on RuralGP.com over the next few days, like we did with the last conference in Dubrovnik, between a very packed and interesting programme of events.
Follow the WONCA World Rural Health Conference on Twitter: